Phoenix Intelligence

Why is a Credit Scoring App a Must-Have?5 min read

Why is a Credit Scoring App a Must-Have?
Why is a Credit Scoring App a Must-Have?

Credit Scoring AI App and Machine learning-based credit assessment algorithms are being developed to speed up loan approvals. Lenders have traditionally relied on credit ratings to make loan decisions for companies and retail clients. Historically, most credit scoring algorithms were constructed on the foundation of financial institution transaction and payment history data.

To compute a credit score, credit scoring models use a number of approaches such as regression, decision trees, and statistical analysis. Instead of relying just on structured data, financial institutions are increasingly depending on a borrower’s social media activity, mobile phone use, and text message usage to obtain a more holistic picture of creditworthiness and improve loan rating accuracy.

Machine learning algorithms applied to this new source of data may now analyse qualitative elements such as consumption patterns and willingness to pay. Additional data on such criteria enables better, faster, and less expensive segmentation of borrower quality, ultimately leading to a faster credit decision. However, the use of personal data raises additional policy problems, such as data privacy and security.

The application of machine learning algorithms in credit scoring may assist broaden access to credit in addition to providing a more accurate and segmented evaluation of creditworthiness.

The classic credit scoring algorithms that are still in use in some markets require that a potential borrower have a significant amount of past credit information in order to be considered ‘scoreable’. A credit score cannot be created without this information, therefore a potential creditworthy applicant is frequently unable to acquire credit and build a credit history.

As a result of using different data sources and machine learning algorithms, lenders may be able to make credit judgements that were previously unthinkable. Credit outstanding in nations with broad credit markets may rise uncontrollably as a result of this tendency, which may be advantageous for economies with limited access to the credit markets.

For a broader perspective, there is no proof that credit scoring models based on machine learning outperform traditional ones. Creditworthiness may be improved by incorporating data from social media, mobile phone use, and text message activity into a more complete picture of a borrower’s creditworthiness. Qualitative aspects such as consumption habits and willingness to pay may now be assessed using machine learning algorithms applied to this new set of data. Additional data on such criteria allows for broader, faster, and cheaper segmentation of borrower quality, which eventually leads to a speedier credit decision.

However, the use of personal data poses additional policy concerns, such as those pertaining to data privacy and protection.

FinTech start-ups that cater to clients who aren’t normally served by banks have sprung up over the past several years. Online lenders who lend in the United States are not the only ones who use an algorithmic approach to data analysis and have extended into other markets, notably China, where most borrowers lack credit ratings. London-based startup uses algorithms and other data sources to check loan applications rejected by lenders for possible faults in order to offer credit ratings for those with “thin” credit files.

Mobile banking applications that utilise bank data and Artificial intelligence to produce financial estimates and help manage finances are becoming increasingly common. These apps might serve as the initial steps toward building a credit history based on data gleaned from traditional banks.

Artificial Intelligence has both advantages and downsides when it comes to credit scoring. It is possible to analyse enormous volumes of data fast thanks to AI. With the use of this technology, credit scoring rules might be developed to deal with more credit inputs, cutting credit risk assessment costs for certain people while increasing the number of people whose credit risk can be assessed. Using non-credit bill payment data such as on-time mobile phone and other utility bill payments might be an example of using big data for credit rating.

As a result of AI, it is possible for persons with no credit history or credit score may now get loans or credit cards, something that was previously impossible owing to a dearth of alternative indicators of a borrower’s ability to repay under conventional credit scoring models.

The usage of complicated algorithms, on the other hand, may result in a lack of transparency for customers. This ‘black box’ nature of machine learning algorithms may pose further problems. It is often more difficult to offer customers, auditors, and supervisors with an explanation of a credit score and accompanying credit decision when utilising machine learning to assign credit scores and make credit judgments. Furthermore, others claim that using new alternative data sources, such as internet behaviour or non-traditional financial information, may inject bias into credit decisions.

Consumer advocacy organisations, in particular, warn out that machine learning algorithms can provide combinations of borrower variables that simply predict race or gender, elements that many jurisdictions’ fair lending rules ban from being used. Because comparable borrowers have previously been offered less favourable loan conditions, these algorithms may rank a borrower from an ethnic minority as having a higher probability of default.

The availability of historical data for a variety of borrowers and loan products is critical to the effectiveness of these technologies. Similarly, the availability, quality, and dependability of data on borrower-product performance over a broad variety of financial conditions is critical to the effectiveness of these risk models.
Some authorities have also observed a paucity of data on emerging AI and machine learning models, as well as a dearth of information regarding the performance of these models throughout a range of financial cycles.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *